 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Main group, Cycle cotr. 1 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Control group, Cycle cotr. 1 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Main group, Cycle cotr. 2 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Control group, Cycle cotr. 2 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Main group, Cycle cotr. 3 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Control group, Cycle cotr. 3 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Main group, Cycle cotr. 4 |
 |
| PERSON TEST.10- men, Control group, Cycle cotr. 4 |
The average dermatological lead value of the group of 10 subjects in the main group was relatively high -3.85 µSiemens and with a course with extreme fluctuations in control cycle 1 (neutral measurement). With the use of the QHRS Biopyramid in the second control cycle, the extreme fluctuations of the dermatological leading value curve were optically clearly harmonized. The stress potential in the group of ten respondents is clearly broken down. In the 4th control cycle, the average dermatological value is 1.04 µSiemens, which leads to a stress reduction of 73% compared to the neutral value. Spontaneous fluctuation in the 4th control cycle is conditioned by the spontaneous kicking of the examinee's legs. The geometric course of the temperature curve was harmonized in the 2nd control cycle, which indicates the harmonizing effect of the QHRS biopyramid on the geobiological fields with a harmful influence.
Comparative dermatological leading values of the skin in the male group of 12 subjects in the control group in all control cycles flowed very sporadically and until the end of the study it was affected by the same fluctuations continuously. The dermatological guide value in the subjects during this study did not allow for a placebo effect. The skin temperature curve in the group of 12 tested persons remained relatively constant in all control cycles.
Subscribe to receive the latest updates on radiation protection and natural medicine.
No spam
Unsubscribe anytime
Share this knowledge
Help others learn more about natural space harmonization.